Demographics details for Midland, TX vs Green bay, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Midland, TX vs Green bay, WI.
Data | Midland | Green bay |
---|---|---|
Population | 134,444 | 106,095 |
Median Age | 31.4 years | 35.6 years |
Median Income | $90,448 | $59,174 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Midland vs Green bay
- In Midland, the population is higher at 134,444, compared to 106,095 in Green bay.
- The median age in Green bay is higher at 35.6 years, compared to 31.4 years in Midland.
- Midland has a higher median income of $90,448 compared to $59,174 in Green bay.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Midland at 40.0% compared to 34.0% in Green bay.
- Midland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Green bay.
- Green bay has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.9% in Midland.
Demographics
Demographics Midland vs Green bay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Midland | Green bay |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 4 |
White | 29 | 61 |
Asian | 2 | 4 |
Hispanic | 45 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Midland vs Green bay
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Midland at 8% compared to 4% in Green bay.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Green bay at 61% compared to 29% in Midland.
- In Green bay, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Midland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Midland at 45% compared to 17% in Green bay.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Midland at 15% compared to 11% in Green bay.
- In Green bay, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Midland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Midland | Green bay |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 11.0% |
Depression | 21.4% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 15.0% | 16.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 22.8% |
Obesity | 35.3% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Midland vs Green bay
- More residents in Midland report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 15.3% in Green bay.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Green bay at 22.1% versus 21.4% in Midland.
- Green bay has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 15.0% in Midland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Green bay at 22.8% compared to 18.6% in Midland.
- Green bay has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 35.3% in Midland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Green bay at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Midland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Midland | Green bay |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.8% (3,705) | 1.7% (1,796) |
High School Diploma | 10.2% (13,724) | 18.1% (19,183) |
Less than High School | 17.6% (23,705) | 14.0% (14,805) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.5% (26,213) | 16.6% (17,606) |
Education Levels Comparison: Midland vs Green bay
- A higher percentage of residents in Midland have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.7% in Green bay.
- In Green bay, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 10.2% in Midland.
- More residents in Midland have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 14.0% in Green bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Midland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 16.6% in Green bay.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.