Demographics details for Midland, TX vs Gallitzin, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Midland, TX vs Gallitzin, PA.
| Data | Midland | Gallitzin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 134,444 | 1,508 |
| Median Age | 31.4 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $90,448 | $52,500 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Midland vs Gallitzin
- In Midland, the population is higher at 134,444, compared to 1,508 in Gallitzin.
- The median age in Gallitzin is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 31.4 years in Midland.
- Midland has a higher median income of $90,448 compared to $52,500 in Gallitzin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Midland at 40.0% compared to 32.0% in Gallitzin.
- The poverty level is identical in both Midland and Gallitzin at 12%.
- Gallitzin has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 2.9% in Midland.
Demographics
Demographics Midland vs Gallitzin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Midland | Gallitzin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | Data is updating |
| White | 29 | 93 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 45 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Midland vs Gallitzin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Midland at 8% compared to 0% in Gallitzin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallitzin at 93% compared to 29% in Midland.
- The Asian population is larger in Midland at 2% compared to 0% in Gallitzin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Midland at 45% compared to 3% in Gallitzin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Midland at 15% compared to 4% in Gallitzin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Midland at 1% compared to 0% in Gallitzin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Midland | Gallitzin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Midland vs Gallitzin
- In Gallitzin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.1% in Midland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallitzin at 25.2% versus 21.4% in Midland.
- Gallitzin has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 15.0% in Midland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Midland at 18.6% compared to 18.5% in Gallitzin.
- Gallitzin has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 35.3% in Midland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallitzin at 22.0% compared to 9.0% in Midland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Midland | Gallitzin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (3,705) | 1.1% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 10.2% (13,724) | 29.8% (449) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (23,705) | 20.6% (310) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.5% (26,213) | 9.9% (150) |
Education Levels Comparison: Midland vs Gallitzin
- A higher percentage of residents in Midland have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.1% in Gallitzin.
- In Gallitzin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.8% compared to 10.2% in Midland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallitzin at 20.6%, compared to 17.6% in Midland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Midland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 9.9% in Gallitzin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.