Demographics details for Midland, TX vs Gainesboro, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Midland, TX vs Gainesboro, TN.
Data | Midland | Gainesboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 134,444 | 936 |
Median Age | 31.4 years | 49.5 years |
Median Income | $90,448 | $37,404 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Midland vs Gainesboro
- In Midland, the population is higher at 134,444, compared to 936 in Gainesboro.
- The median age in Gainesboro is higher at 49.5 years, compared to 31.4 years in Midland.
- Midland has a higher median income of $90,448 compared to $37,404 in Gainesboro.
- In Gainesboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 40.0% in Midland.
- The poverty level is higher in Gainesboro at 13%, compared to 12% in Midland.
- Gainesboro has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.9% in Midland.
Demographics
Demographics Midland vs Gainesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Midland | Gainesboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 4 |
White | 29 | 85 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 45 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Midland vs Gainesboro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Midland at 8% compared to 4% in Gainesboro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gainesboro at 85% compared to 29% in Midland.
- The Asian population is larger in Midland at 2% compared to 0% in Gainesboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Midland at 45% compared to 4% in Gainesboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Midland at 15% compared to 7% in Gainesboro.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Midland at 1% compared to 0% in Gainesboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Midland | Gainesboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 20.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 15.0% |
Depression | 21.4% | 30.4% |
Smoking | 15.0% | 25.4% |
Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 35.3% | 36.1% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 33.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Midland vs Gainesboro
- In Gainesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 16.1% in Midland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gainesboro at 30.4% versus 21.4% in Midland.
- Gainesboro has a higher smoking rate at 25.4% compared to 15.0% in Midland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Midland at 18.6% compared to 15.6% in Gainesboro.
- Gainesboro has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 35.3% in Midland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gainesboro at 33.0% compared to 9.0% in Midland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Midland | Gainesboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.8% (3,705) | 0.3% (3) |
High School Diploma | 10.2% (13,724) | 32.5% (304) |
Less than High School | 17.6% (23,705) | 34.2% (320) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.5% (26,213) | 10.6% (99) |
Education Levels Comparison: Midland vs Gainesboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Midland have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.3% in Gainesboro.
- In Gainesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.5% compared to 10.2% in Midland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gainesboro at 34.2%, compared to 17.6% in Midland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Midland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 10.6% in Gainesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.