Demographics details for Middletown, MD vs Chapman, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Middletown, MD vs Chapman, KS.
| Data | Middletown | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,239 | 1,371 |
| Median Age | 41.3 years | 41.4 years |
| Median Income | $168,007 | $66,964 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Middletown vs Chapman
- In Middletown, the population is higher at 5,239, compared to 1,371 in Chapman.
- The median age in Chapman is higher at 41.4 years, compared to 41.3 years in Middletown.
- Middletown has a higher median income of $168,007 compared to $66,964 in Chapman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Middletown at 46.0% compared to 33.0% in Chapman.
- The poverty level is higher in Chapman at 8%, compared to 0% in Middletown.
- The unemployment rate in Middletown is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.1% in Chapman.
Demographics
Demographics Middletown vs Chapman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Middletown | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 82 | 81 |
| Asian | 9 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Middletown vs Chapman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Middletown at 2% compared to 0% in Chapman.
- Middletown has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 81% in Chapman.
- The Asian population is larger in Middletown at 9% compared to 3% in Chapman.
- Chapman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Middletown.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chapman at 7%, compared to 5% in Middletown.
- In Chapman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Middletown.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Middletown | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.0% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 10.2% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 30.7% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Middletown vs Chapman
- In Chapman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 13.7% in Middletown.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chapman at 21.4% versus 19.7% in Middletown.
- Chapman has a higher smoking rate at 16.6% compared to 10.2% in Middletown.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chapman at 20.2% compared to 17.7% in Middletown.
- Chapman has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 30.7% in Middletown.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chapman at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Middletown.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Middletown | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 7.8% (408) | 12.3% (168) |
| Less than High School | 2.5% (132) | 5.1% (70) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.7% (1,977) | 15.5% (212) |
Education Levels Comparison: Middletown vs Chapman
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Middletown and Chapman at 0.0%.
- In Chapman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 7.8% in Middletown.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chapman at 5.1%, compared to 2.5% in Middletown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Middletown hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.7% compared to 15.5% in Chapman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.