Demographics details for Middletown, CT vs Wichita falls, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Middletown, CT vs Wichita falls, TX.

Data Middletown Wichita falls
Population 48,729 102,664
Median Age 37.5 years 32.8 years
Median Income $75,120 $55,584
Married Families 34.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 9% 14%
Unemployment Rate 2.9 4.9

Population Comparison: Middletown vs Wichita falls

  • The population in Wichita falls is higher at 102,664, compared to 48,729 in Middletown.
  • Residents in Middletown have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 32.8 years in Wichita falls.
  • Middletown has a higher median income of $75,120 compared to $55,584 in Wichita falls.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Middletown and Wichita falls at 34.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Wichita falls at 14%, compared to 9% in Middletown.
  • Wichita falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 2.9% in Middletown.

Demographics

Demographics Middletown vs Wichita falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Middletown Wichita falls
Black 15 12
White 61 54
Asian 5 3
Hispanic 11 22
Two or More Races 8 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Middletown vs Wichita falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Middletown at 15% compared to 12% in Wichita falls.
  • Middletown has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 54% in Wichita falls.
  • The Asian population is larger in Middletown at 5% compared to 3% in Wichita falls.
  • Wichita falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 11% in Middletown.
  • Both Middletown and Wichita falls have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
  • In Wichita falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Middletown.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Middletown Wichita falls
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.0% 12.5%
Depression 23.7% 24.6%
Smoking 14.5% 18.6%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 18.7%
Obesity 33.2% 37.1%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Middletown vs Wichita falls

  • In Wichita falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.8% in Middletown.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Wichita falls at 24.6% versus 23.7% in Middletown.
  • Wichita falls has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 14.5% in Middletown.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Wichita falls at 18.7% compared to 16.7% in Middletown.
  • Wichita falls has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 33.2% in Middletown.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wichita falls at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Middletown.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Middletown Wichita falls
No Schooling 0.5% (237) 1.0% (1,035)
High School Diploma 16.3% (7,958) 15.1% (15,510)
Less than High School 6.1% (2,971) 14.6% (14,970)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.7% (13,510) 15.1% (15,550)

Education Levels Comparison: Middletown vs Wichita falls

  • In Wichita falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Middletown.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Middletown hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 15.1% in Wichita falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wichita falls at 14.6%, compared to 6.1% in Middletown.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Middletown hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.7% compared to 15.1% in Wichita falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.