Demographics details for Middleton, ID vs Sulphur springs, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Middleton, ID vs Sulphur springs, TX.

Data Middleton Sulphur springs
Population 10,651 16,408
Median Age 34.9 years 39.4 years
Median Income $68,947 $54,950
Married Families 35.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 7% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Middleton vs Sulphur springs

  • The population in Sulphur springs is higher at 16,408, compared to 10,651 in Middleton.
  • The median age in Sulphur springs is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 34.9 years in Middleton.
  • Middleton has a higher median income of $68,947 compared to $54,950 in Sulphur springs.
  • In Sulphur springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 35.0% in Middleton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sulphur springs at 15%, compared to 7% in Middleton.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Middleton.

Demographics

Demographics Middleton vs Sulphur springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Middleton Sulphur springs
Black Data is updating 14
White 82 63
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 11 17
Two or More Races 6 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Middleton vs Sulphur springs

  • In Sulphur springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 0% in Middleton.
  • Middleton has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 63% in Sulphur springs.
  • Both Middleton and Sulphur springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 11% in Middleton.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Middleton at 6% compared to 5% in Sulphur springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Middleton and Sulphur springs at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Middleton Sulphur springs
Mental Health Not Good 16.1% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 13.2%
Depression 23.9% 24.8%
Smoking 16.3% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 17.5%
Obesity 34.9% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Middleton vs Sulphur springs

  • In Sulphur springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.1% in Middleton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur springs at 24.8% versus 23.9% in Middleton.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 16.3% in Middleton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sulphur springs at 17.5% compared to 16.1% in Middleton.
  • Sulphur springs has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 34.9% in Middleton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur springs at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Middleton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Middleton Sulphur springs
No Schooling 0.1% (7) 0.8% (127)
High School Diploma 9.5% (1,007) 18.3% (3,003)
Less than High School 5.0% (532) 16.0% (2,628)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.3% (1,736) 13.7% (2,248)

Education Levels Comparison: Middleton vs Sulphur springs

  • In Sulphur springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.1% in Middleton.
  • In Sulphur springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 9.5% in Middleton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur springs at 16.0%, compared to 5.0% in Middleton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Middleton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.