Demographics details for Middle river, MD vs South holland, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Middle river, MD vs South holland, IL.

Data Middle river South holland
Population 31,155 20,685
Median Age 36.7 years 42.6 years
Median Income $72,970 $79,567
Married Families 33.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 8% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 5.2

Population Comparison: Middle river vs South holland

  • In Middle river, the population is higher at 31,155, compared to 20,685 in South holland.
  • The median age in South holland is higher at 42.6 years, compared to 36.7 years in Middle river.
  • South holland has a higher median income of $79,567, compared to $72,970 in Middle river.
  • In South holland, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 33.0% in Middle river.
  • The poverty level is higher in South holland at 10%, compared to 8% in Middle river.
  • South holland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.0% in Middle river.

Demographics

Demographics Middle river vs South holland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Middle river South holland
Black 29 83
White 51 8
Asian 7 1
Hispanic 8 5
Two or More Races 5 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Middle river vs South holland

  • In South holland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 83% compared to 29% in Middle river.
  • Middle river has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 8% in South holland.
  • The Asian population is larger in Middle river at 7% compared to 1% in South holland.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Middle river at 8% compared to 5% in South holland.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Middle river at 5% compared to 3% in South holland.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Middle river and South holland at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Middle river South holland
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 10.9%
Depression 24.1% 15.1%
Smoking 17.2% 15.3%
Binge Drinking 15.0% 15.6%
Obesity 38.7% 37.3%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Middle river vs South holland

  • More residents in Middle river report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.8% in South holland.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Middle river at 24.1% compared to 15.1% in South holland.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Middle river at 17.2% compared to 15.3% in South holland.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South holland at 15.6% compared to 15.0% in Middle river.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Middle river at 38.7% compared to 37.3% in South holland.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Middle river at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in South holland.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Middle river South holland
No Schooling 2.6% (818) 0.5% (94)
High School Diploma 20.1% (6,254) 15.5% (3,210)
Less than High School 14.8% (4,616) 7.8% (1,623)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.4% (6,048) 20.0% (4,142)

Education Levels Comparison: Middle river vs South holland

  • A higher percentage of residents in Middle river have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.5% in South holland.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Middle river hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 15.5% in South holland.
  • More residents in Middle river have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 7.8% in South holland.
  • In South holland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 19.4% in Middle river.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.