Demographics details for Middle river, MD vs Smyrna, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Middle river, MD vs Smyrna, GA.
| Data | Middle river | Smyrna |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,155 | 56,160 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $72,970 | $92,258 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Middle river vs Smyrna
- The population in Smyrna is higher at 56,160, compared to 31,155 in Middle river.
- Residents in Middle river have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 35.6 years in Smyrna.
- Smyrna has a higher median income of $92,258, compared to $72,970 in Middle river.
- In Smyrna, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Middle river.
- The poverty level is identical in both Middle river and Smyrna at 8%.
- The unemployment rate in Middle river is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.4% in Smyrna.
Demographics
Demographics Middle river vs Smyrna provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Middle river | Smyrna |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 33 |
| White | 51 | 40 |
| Asian | 7 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Middle river vs Smyrna
- In Smyrna, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 33% compared to 29% in Middle river.
- Middle river has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 40% in Smyrna.
- In Smyrna, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 7% in Middle river.
- Smyrna has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 8% in Middle river.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Smyrna at 7%, compared to 5% in Middle river.
- In Smyrna, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Middle river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Middle river | Smyrna |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 38.7% | 30.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Middle river vs Smyrna
- More residents in Middle river report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.8% in Smyrna.
- Depression is more prevalent in Middle river at 24.1% compared to 17.4% in Smyrna.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Middle river at 17.2% compared to 11.9% in Smyrna.
- Binge drinking is more common in Middle river at 15.0% compared to 14.9% in Smyrna.
- Obesity rates are higher in Middle river at 38.7% compared to 30.0% in Smyrna.
- Disability percentages are higher in Middle river at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Smyrna.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Middle river | Smyrna |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (818) | 0.4% (203) |
| High School Diploma | 20.1% (6,254) | 7.8% (4,397) |
| Less than High School | 14.8% (4,616) | 5.6% (3,139) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (6,048) | 41.0% (23,025) |
Education Levels Comparison: Middle river vs Smyrna
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.4% in Smyrna.
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 7.8% in Smyrna.
- More residents in Middle river have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 5.6% in Smyrna.
- In Smyrna, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.0% compared to 19.4% in Middle river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.