Demographics details for Middle river, MD vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Middle river, MD vs Loves park, IL.
Data | Middle river | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Population | 31,155 | 23,365 |
Median Age | 36.7 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $72,970 | $56,370 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Middle river vs Loves park
- In Middle river, the population is higher at 31,155, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- Residents in Middle river have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Middle river has a higher median income of $72,970 compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Middle river.
- The poverty level is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 8% in Middle river.
- The unemployment rate in Middle river is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Middle river vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Middle river | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 7 |
White | 51 | 71 |
Asian | 7 | 3 |
Hispanic | 8 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Middle river vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Middle river at 29% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Loves park at 71% compared to 51% in Middle river.
- The Asian population is larger in Middle river at 7% compared to 3% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 8% in Middle river.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 5% in Middle river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Middle river and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Middle river | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 11.3% |
Depression | 24.1% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 17.2% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 38.7% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Middle river vs Loves park
- More residents in Middle river report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Middle river at 24.1% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Middle river at 17.2% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Middle river.
- Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 38.7% in Middle river.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Middle river and Loves park at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Middle river | Loves park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.6% (818) | 0.4% (97) |
High School Diploma | 20.1% (6,254) | 17.1% (3,994) |
Less than High School | 14.8% (4,616) | 9.7% (2,262) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (6,048) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Middle river vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
- More residents in Middle river have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.