Demographics details for Middle river, MD vs Lewiston, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Middle river, MD vs Lewiston, ME.
Data | Middle river | Lewiston |
---|---|---|
Population | 31,155 | 38,493 |
Median Age | 36.7 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $72,970 | $54,317 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Middle river vs Lewiston
- The population in Lewiston is higher at 38,493, compared to 31,155 in Middle river.
- The median age in Lewiston is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 36.7 years in Middle river.
- Middle river has a higher median income of $72,970 compared to $54,317 in Lewiston.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Middle river and Lewiston at 33.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Lewiston at 11%, compared to 8% in Middle river.
- The unemployment rate in Middle river is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Lewiston.
Demographics
Demographics Middle river vs Lewiston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Middle river | Lewiston |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 11 |
White | 51 | 79 |
Asian | 7 | 2 |
Hispanic | 8 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Middle river vs Lewiston
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Middle river at 29% compared to 11% in Lewiston.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lewiston at 79% compared to 51% in Middle river.
- The Asian population is larger in Middle river at 7% compared to 2% in Lewiston.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Middle river at 8% compared to 3% in Lewiston.
- Both Middle river and Lewiston have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Middle river and Lewiston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Middle river | Lewiston |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 19.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 13.2% |
Depression | 24.1% | 30.0% |
Smoking | 17.2% | 21.9% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 38.7% | 37.8% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Middle river vs Lewiston
- In Lewiston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.8% in Middle river.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lewiston at 30.0% versus 24.1% in Middle river.
- Lewiston has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 17.2% in Middle river.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lewiston at 16.1% compared to 15.0% in Middle river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Middle river at 38.7% compared to 37.8% in Lewiston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lewiston at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Middle river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Middle river | Lewiston |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.6% (818) | 1.5% (574) |
High School Diploma | 20.1% (6,254) | 19.7% (7,566) |
Less than High School | 14.8% (4,616) | 13.5% (5,195) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (6,048) | 14.4% (5,538) |
Education Levels Comparison: Middle river vs Lewiston
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.5% in Lewiston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 19.7% in Lewiston.
- More residents in Middle river have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 13.5% in Lewiston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 14.4% in Lewiston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.