Demographics details for Middle river, MD vs Glen ellyn, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Middle river, MD vs Glen ellyn, IL.
Data | Middle river | Glen ellyn |
---|---|---|
Population | 31,155 | 28,364 |
Median Age | 36.7 years | 41.6 years |
Median Income | $72,970 | $128,132 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Middle river vs Glen ellyn
- In Middle river, the population is higher at 31,155, compared to 28,364 in Glen ellyn.
- The median age in Glen ellyn is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 36.7 years in Middle river.
- Glen ellyn has a higher median income of $128,132, compared to $72,970 in Middle river.
- In Glen ellyn, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 33.0% in Middle river.
- Middle river has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Glen ellyn.
- Glen ellyn has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.0% in Middle river.
Demographics
Demographics Middle river vs Glen ellyn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Middle river | Glen ellyn |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 3 |
White | 51 | 78 |
Asian | 7 | 9 |
Hispanic | 8 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Middle river vs Glen ellyn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Middle river at 29% compared to 3% in Glen ellyn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Glen ellyn at 78% compared to 51% in Middle river.
- In Glen ellyn, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 7% in Middle river.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Middle river at 8% compared to 5% in Glen ellyn.
- Both Middle river and Glen ellyn have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Middle river and Glen ellyn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Middle river | Glen ellyn |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 11.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 7.4% |
Depression | 24.1% | 17.3% |
Smoking | 17.2% | 9.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 38.7% | 29.2% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Middle river vs Glen ellyn
- More residents in Middle river report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 11.9% in Glen ellyn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Middle river at 24.1% compared to 17.3% in Glen ellyn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Middle river at 17.2% compared to 9.4% in Glen ellyn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Glen ellyn at 17.2% compared to 15.0% in Middle river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Middle river at 38.7% compared to 29.2% in Glen ellyn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Middle river at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Glen ellyn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Middle river | Glen ellyn |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.6% (818) | 0.3% (93) |
High School Diploma | 20.1% (6,254) | 6.4% (1,815) |
Less than High School | 14.8% (4,616) | 4.1% (1,149) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (6,048) | 45.8% (12,997) |
Education Levels Comparison: Middle river vs Glen ellyn
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.3% in Glen ellyn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 6.4% in Glen ellyn.
- More residents in Middle river have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 4.1% in Glen ellyn.
- In Glen ellyn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.8% compared to 19.4% in Middle river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.