Demographics details for Middle river, MD vs Breckenridge, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Middle river, MD vs Breckenridge, MN.

Data Middle river Breckenridge
Population 31,155 3,348
Median Age 36.7 years 41.3 years
Median Income $72,970 $57,094
Married Families 33.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 8% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 5.2

Population Comparison: Middle river vs Breckenridge

  • In Middle river, the population is higher at 31,155, compared to 3,348 in Breckenridge.
  • The median age in Breckenridge is higher at 41.3 years, compared to 36.7 years in Middle river.
  • Middle river has a higher median income of $72,970 compared to $57,094 in Breckenridge.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Middle river and Breckenridge at 33.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Breckenridge at 10%, compared to 8% in Middle river.
  • Breckenridge has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.0% in Middle river.

Demographics

Demographics Middle river vs Breckenridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Middle river Breckenridge
Black 29 Data is updating
White 51 95
Asian 7 Data is updating
Hispanic 8 3
Two or More Races 5 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Middle river vs Breckenridge

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Middle river at 29% compared to 0% in Breckenridge.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Breckenridge at 95% compared to 51% in Middle river.
  • The Asian population is larger in Middle river at 7% compared to 0% in Breckenridge.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Middle river at 8% compared to 3% in Breckenridge.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Middle river at 5% compared to 2% in Breckenridge.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Middle river and Breckenridge at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Middle river Breckenridge
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 14.7%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 9.1%
Depression 24.1% 22.6%
Smoking 17.2% 16.8%
Binge Drinking 15.0% 20.8%
Obesity 38.7% 38.6%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Middle river vs Breckenridge

  • More residents in Middle river report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.7% in Breckenridge.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Middle river at 24.1% compared to 22.6% in Breckenridge.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Middle river at 17.2% compared to 16.8% in Breckenridge.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Breckenridge at 20.8% compared to 15.0% in Middle river.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Middle river at 38.7% compared to 38.6% in Breckenridge.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Breckenridge at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Middle river.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Middle river Breckenridge
No Schooling 2.6% (818) 1.1% (37)
High School Diploma 20.1% (6,254) 19.8% (662)
Less than High School 14.8% (4,616) 11.7% (392)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.4% (6,048) 18.4% (616)

Education Levels Comparison: Middle river vs Breckenridge

  • A higher percentage of residents in Middle river have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.1% in Breckenridge.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Middle river hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 19.8% in Breckenridge.
  • More residents in Middle river have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 11.7% in Breckenridge.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Middle river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 18.4% in Breckenridge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.