Demographics details for Middle river, MD vs Bonita, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Middle river, MD vs Bonita, CA.
| Data | Middle river | Bonita |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,155 | 13,473 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $72,970 | $115,118 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Middle river vs Bonita
- In Middle river, the population is higher at 31,155, compared to 13,473 in Bonita.
- The median age in Bonita is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 36.7 years in Middle river.
- Bonita has a higher median income of $115,118, compared to $72,970 in Middle river.
- In Bonita, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 33.0% in Middle river.
- Middle river has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 7% in Bonita.
- The unemployment rate in Middle river is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Bonita.
Demographics
Demographics Middle river vs Bonita provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Middle river | Bonita |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 2 |
| White | 51 | 17 |
| Asian | 7 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Middle river vs Bonita
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Middle river at 29% compared to 2% in Bonita.
- Middle river has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 17% in Bonita.
- In Bonita, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 7% in Middle river.
- Bonita has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 8% in Middle river.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bonita at 21%, compared to 5% in Middle river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Middle river and Bonita at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Middle river | Bonita |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 16.2% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 9.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 38.7% | 23.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Middle river vs Bonita
- More residents in Middle river report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.3% in Bonita.
- Depression is more prevalent in Middle river at 24.1% compared to 16.2% in Bonita.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Middle river at 17.2% compared to 9.1% in Bonita.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bonita at 19.1% compared to 15.0% in Middle river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Middle river at 38.7% compared to 23.3% in Bonita.
- Disability percentages are higher in Middle river at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Bonita.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Middle river | Bonita |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (818) | 1.3% (177) |
| High School Diploma | 20.1% (6,254) | 12.6% (1,704) |
| Less than High School | 14.8% (4,616) | 13.3% (1,796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (6,048) | 29.2% (3,934) |
Education Levels Comparison: Middle river vs Bonita
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.3% in Bonita.
- A higher percentage of residents in Middle river hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 12.6% in Bonita.
- More residents in Middle river have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 13.3% in Bonita.
- In Bonita, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.2% compared to 19.4% in Middle river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.