Demographics details for Middle point, OH vs Taylorsville, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Middle point, OH vs Taylorsville, UT.

Data Middle point Taylorsville
Population 565 57,879
Median Age 37.0 years 33.7 years
Median Income $54,479 $81,417
Married Families 44.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 8% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.6

Population Comparison: Middle point vs Taylorsville

  • The population in Taylorsville is higher at 57,879, compared to 565 in Middle point.
  • Residents in Middle point have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
  • Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417, compared to $54,479 in Middle point.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Middle point at 44.0% compared to 40.0% in Taylorsville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Taylorsville at 9%, compared to 8% in Middle point.
  • The unemployment rate in Middle point is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.

Demographics

Demographics Middle point vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Middle point Taylorsville
Black Data is updating 1
White 99 57
Asian Data is updating 7
Hispanic Data is updating 25
Two or More Races 1 9
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Middle point vs Taylorsville

  • In Taylorsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Middle point.
  • Middle point has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
  • In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Middle point.
  • Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 0% in Middle point.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Taylorsville at 9%, compared to 1% in Middle point.
  • In Taylorsville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Middle point.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Middle point Taylorsville
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 18.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 11.4%
Depression 23.4% 27.2%
Smoking 18.5% 10.0%
Binge Drinking 19.3% 15.2%
Obesity 41.8% 32.0%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Middle point vs Taylorsville

  • In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 16.7% in Middle point.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 27.2% versus 23.4% in Middle point.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Middle point at 18.5% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Middle point at 19.3% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Middle point at 41.8% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Middle point and Taylorsville at 12.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Middle point Taylorsville
No Schooling 1.1% (6) 1.2% (721)
High School Diploma 34.2% (193) 16.9% (9,799)
Less than High School 13.1% (74) 15.2% (8,775)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.4% (53) 15.7% (9,066)

Education Levels Comparison: Middle point vs Taylorsville

  • In Taylorsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.1% in Middle point.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Middle point hold a high school diploma at 34.2% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 15.2%, compared to 13.1% in Middle point.
  • In Taylorsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 9.4% in Middle point.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.