Demographics details for Miami gardens, FL vs Pequot lakes, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Miami gardens, FL vs Pequot lakes, MN.

Data Miami gardens Pequot lakes
Population 110,497 2,440
Median Age 38.2 years 40.5 years
Median Income $56,071 $73,125
Married Families 29.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 19% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 3.5

Population Comparison: Miami gardens vs Pequot lakes

  • In Miami gardens, the population is higher at 110,497, compared to 2,440 in Pequot lakes.
  • The median age in Pequot lakes is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 38.2 years in Miami gardens.
  • Pequot lakes has a higher median income of $73,125, compared to $56,071 in Miami gardens.
  • In Pequot lakes, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 29.0% in Miami gardens.
  • Miami gardens has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 9% in Pequot lakes.
  • The unemployment rate in Miami gardens is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Pequot lakes.

Demographics

Demographics Miami gardens vs Pequot lakes provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Miami gardens Pequot lakes
Black 66 1
White -15 94
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 34 1
Two or More Races 15 2
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Miami gardens vs Pequot lakes

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Miami gardens at 66% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pequot lakes at 94% compared to -15% in Miami gardens.
  • In Pequot lakes, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Miami gardens.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Miami gardens at 34% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Miami gardens at 15% compared to 2% in Pequot lakes.
  • In Pequot lakes, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Miami gardens.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Miami gardens Pequot lakes
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 14.3% 8.5%
Depression 15.9% 23.3%
Smoking 22.2% 15.2%
Binge Drinking 11.9% 19.4%
Obesity 36.1% 30.3%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Miami gardens vs Pequot lakes

  • More residents in Miami gardens report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.4% in Pequot lakes.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Pequot lakes at 23.3% versus 15.9% in Miami gardens.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Miami gardens at 22.2% compared to 15.2% in Pequot lakes.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Pequot lakes at 19.4% compared to 11.9% in Miami gardens.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Miami gardens at 36.1% compared to 30.3% in Pequot lakes.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pequot lakes at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Miami gardens.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Miami gardens Pequot lakes
No Schooling 3.5% (3,891) 0.7% (17)
High School Diploma 23.1% (25,548) 14.0% (341)
Less than High School 18.4% (20,320) 3.4% (84)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.2% (13,496) 20.7% (504)

Education Levels Comparison: Miami gardens vs Pequot lakes

  • A higher percentage of residents in Miami gardens have no formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.7% in Pequot lakes.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Miami gardens hold a high school diploma at 23.1% compared to 14.0% in Pequot lakes.
  • More residents in Miami gardens have less than a high school education at 18.4% compared to 3.4% in Pequot lakes.
  • In Pequot lakes, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 12.2% in Miami gardens.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.