Demographics details for Mi wuk village, CA vs Woodridge, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mi wuk village, CA vs Woodridge, IL.

Data Mi wuk village Woodridge
Population 1,010 33,587
Median Age 53.6 years 37.7 years
Median Income $91,848 $95,756
Married Families 61.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 5% 5%
Unemployment Rate 6.2 5.4

Population Comparison: Mi wuk village vs Woodridge

  • The population in Woodridge is higher at 33,587, compared to 1,010 in Mi wuk village.
  • Residents in Mi wuk village have a higher median age of 53.6 years compared to 37.7 years in Woodridge.
  • Woodridge has a higher median income of $95,756, compared to $91,848 in Mi wuk village.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mi wuk village at 61.0% compared to 43.0% in Woodridge.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Mi wuk village and Woodridge at 5%.
  • The unemployment rate in Mi wuk village is higher at 6.2%, compared to 5.4% in Woodridge.

Demographics

Demographics Mi wuk village vs Woodridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mi wuk village Woodridge
Black Data is updating 11
White 95 53
Asian 2 13
Hispanic 3 16
Two or More Races Data is updating 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mi wuk village vs Woodridge

  • In Woodridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Mi wuk village.
  • Mi wuk village has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 53% in Woodridge.
  • In Woodridge, the Asian population stands at 13%, greater than 2% in Mi wuk village.
  • Woodridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 3% in Mi wuk village.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodridge at 7%, compared to 0% in Mi wuk village.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mi wuk village and Woodridge at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mi wuk village Woodridge
Mental Health Not Good 16.1% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 8.1%
Depression 21.4% 16.9%
Smoking 11.7% 10.9%
Binge Drinking 19.8% 16.3%
Obesity 27.3% 30.6%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mi wuk village vs Woodridge

  • More residents in Mi wuk village report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 12.5% in Woodridge.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mi wuk village at 21.4% compared to 16.9% in Woodridge.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mi wuk village at 11.7% compared to 10.9% in Woodridge.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mi wuk village at 19.8% compared to 16.3% in Woodridge.
  • Woodridge has higher obesity rates at 30.6% compared to 27.3% in Mi wuk village.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mi wuk village at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodridge.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mi wuk village Woodridge
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.0% (340)
High School Diploma 18.7% (189) 10.4% (3,489)
Less than High School 10.3% (104) 8.1% (2,732)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.3% (256) 32.7% (10,993)

Education Levels Comparison: Mi wuk village vs Woodridge

  • In Woodridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Mi wuk village.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mi wuk village hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 10.4% in Woodridge.
  • More residents in Mi wuk village have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 8.1% in Woodridge.
  • In Woodridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.7% compared to 25.3% in Mi wuk village.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.