Demographics details for Mi wuk village, CA vs Freeland, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mi wuk village, CA vs Freeland, WA.
Data | Mi wuk village | Freeland |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,010 | 1,894 |
Median Age | 53.6 years | 51.2 years |
Median Income | $91,848 | $89,868 |
Married Families | 61.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Mi wuk village vs Freeland
- The population in Freeland is higher at 1,894, compared to 1,010 in Mi wuk village.
- Residents in Mi wuk village have a higher median age of 53.6 years compared to 51.2 years in Freeland.
- Mi wuk village has a higher median income of $91,848 compared to $89,868 in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mi wuk village at 61.0% compared to 44.0% in Freeland.
- The poverty level is identical in both Mi wuk village and Freeland at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Mi wuk village is higher at 6.2%, compared to 5.1% in Freeland.
Demographics
Demographics Mi wuk village vs Freeland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mi wuk village | Freeland |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 95 | 86 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mi wuk village vs Freeland
- In Freeland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Mi wuk village.
- Mi wuk village has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 86% in Freeland.
- The Asian population is larger in Mi wuk village at 2% compared to 1% in Freeland.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Mi wuk village and Freeland at 3%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Freeland at 6%, compared to 0% in Mi wuk village.
- In Freeland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mi wuk village.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mi wuk village | Freeland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 9.2% |
Depression | 21.4% | 25.5% |
Smoking | 11.7% | 11.8% |
Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 18.0% |
Obesity | 27.3% | 29.6% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mi wuk village vs Freeland
- More residents in Mi wuk village report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 15.8% in Freeland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Freeland at 25.5% versus 21.4% in Mi wuk village.
- Freeland has a higher smoking rate at 11.8% compared to 11.7% in Mi wuk village.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mi wuk village at 19.8% compared to 18.0% in Freeland.
- Freeland has higher obesity rates at 29.6% compared to 27.3% in Mi wuk village.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Freeland at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Mi wuk village.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mi wuk village | Freeland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.7% (189) | 8.1% (153) |
Less than High School | 10.3% (104) | 8.7% (164) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.3% (256) | 28.9% (548) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mi wuk village vs Freeland
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Mi wuk village and Freeland at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mi wuk village hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 8.1% in Freeland.
- More residents in Mi wuk village have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 8.7% in Freeland.
- In Freeland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 25.3% in Mi wuk village.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.