Demographics details for Methuen, MA vs Addison, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Methuen, MA vs Addison, AL.
Data | Methuen | Addison |
---|---|---|
Population | 53,241 | 669 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $93,681 | $47,188 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Methuen vs Addison
- In Methuen, the population is higher at 53,241, compared to 669 in Addison.
- Residents in Methuen have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 38.4 years in Addison.
- Methuen has a higher median income of $93,681 compared to $47,188 in Addison.
- In Addison, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 39.0% in Methuen.
- The poverty level is higher in Addison at 12%, compared to 8% in Methuen.
- The unemployment rate in Methuen is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.5% in Addison.
Demographics
Demographics Methuen vs Addison provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Methuen | Addison |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 51 | 97 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 30 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Methuen vs Addison
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Methuen at 5% compared to 0% in Addison.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Addison at 97% compared to 51% in Methuen.
- The Asian population is larger in Methuen at 4% compared to 0% in Addison.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Methuen at 30% compared to 0% in Addison.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Methuen at 10% compared to 3% in Addison.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Methuen and Addison at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Methuen | Addison |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 13.7% |
Depression | 23.4% | 26.6% |
Smoking | 14.1% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 30.4% | 38.2% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Methuen vs Addison
- In Addison, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.1% in Methuen.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Addison at 26.6% versus 23.4% in Methuen.
- Addison has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 14.1% in Methuen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Methuen at 17.7% compared to 16.1% in Addison.
- Addison has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 30.4% in Methuen.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Addison at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Methuen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Methuen | Addison |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (741) | 0.6% (4) |
High School Diploma | 17.4% (9,266) | 23.8% (159) |
Less than High School | 13.9% (7,384) | 23.9% (160) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (11,336) | 4.9% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Methuen vs Addison
- A higher percentage of residents in Methuen have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Addison.
- In Addison, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 17.4% in Methuen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Addison at 23.9%, compared to 13.9% in Methuen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Methuen hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 4.9% in Addison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.