Demographics details for Mesquite, TX vs San francisco, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mesquite, TX vs San francisco, CA.

Data Mesquite San francisco
Population 147,899 808,437
Median Age 33.4 years 39.3 years
Median Income $69,649 $136,689
Married Families 35.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.6

Population Comparison: Mesquite vs San francisco

  • The population in San francisco is higher at 808,437, compared to 147,899 in Mesquite.
  • The median age in San francisco is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 33.4 years in Mesquite.
  • San francisco has a higher median income of $136,689, compared to $69,649 in Mesquite.
  • In San francisco, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Mesquite.
  • The poverty level is higher in San francisco at 12%, compared to 9% in Mesquite.
  • The unemployment rate in Mesquite is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in San francisco.

Demographics

Demographics Mesquite vs San francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mesquite San francisco
Black 25 5
White 10 31
Asian 3 37
Hispanic 45 16
Two or More Races 16 10
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Mesquite vs San francisco

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mesquite at 25% compared to 5% in San francisco.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in San francisco at 31% compared to 10% in Mesquite.
  • In San francisco, the Asian population stands at 37%, greater than 3% in Mesquite.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Mesquite at 45% compared to 16% in San francisco.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Mesquite at 16% compared to 10% in San francisco.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mesquite and San francisco at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mesquite San francisco
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 13.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 8.4%
Depression 23.3% 15.7%
Smoking 18.3% 9.2%
Binge Drinking 18.0% 16.4%
Obesity 35.6% 19.1%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mesquite vs San francisco

  • More residents in Mesquite report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 13.4% in San francisco.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mesquite at 23.3% compared to 15.7% in San francisco.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mesquite at 18.3% compared to 9.2% in San francisco.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mesquite at 18.0% compared to 16.4% in San francisco.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mesquite at 35.6% compared to 19.1% in San francisco.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mesquite at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in San francisco.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mesquite San francisco
No Schooling 1.7% (2,448) 3.0% (23,928)
High School Diploma 15.8% (23,375) 8.5% (68,418)
Less than High School 22.4% (33,127) 12.4% (99,947)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.8% (15,989) 50.3% (406,774)

Education Levels Comparison: Mesquite vs San francisco

  • In San francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.7% in Mesquite.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mesquite hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 8.5% in San francisco.
  • More residents in Mesquite have less than a high school education at 22.4% compared to 12.4% in San francisco.
  • In San francisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 10.8% in Mesquite.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.