Demographics details for Mesa, CO vs Tappahannock, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mesa, CO vs Tappahannock, VA.
| Data | Mesa | Tappahannock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 158,636 | 2,192 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 48.2 years |
| Median Income | $68,077 | $40,703 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Mesa vs Tappahannock
- In Mesa, the population is higher at 158,636, compared to 2,192 in Tappahannock.
- The median age in Tappahannock is higher at 48.2 years, compared to 40.6 years in Mesa.
- Mesa has a higher median income of $68,077 compared to $40,703 in Tappahannock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mesa at 40.0% compared to 27.0% in Tappahannock.
- The poverty level is higher in Tappahannock at 12%, compared to 10% in Mesa.
- The unemployment rate in Mesa is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.0% in Tappahannock.
Demographics
Demographics Mesa vs Tappahannock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mesa | Tappahannock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 42 |
| White | 73 | 51 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mesa vs Tappahannock
- In Tappahannock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 1% in Mesa.
- Mesa has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 51% in Tappahannock.
- Both Mesa and Tappahannock have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mesa at 15% compared to 2% in Tappahannock.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mesa at 9% compared to 4% in Tappahannock.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mesa at 1% compared to 0% in Tappahannock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mesa | Tappahannock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 28.9% | 44.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mesa vs Tappahannock
- In Tappahannock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Mesa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mesa at 23.9% compared to 22.4% in Tappahannock.
- Tappahannock has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 16.4% in Mesa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mesa at 19.6% compared to 14.1% in Tappahannock.
- Tappahannock has higher obesity rates at 44.7% compared to 28.9% in Mesa.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mesa at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Tappahannock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mesa | Tappahannock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (704) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.4% (26,042) | 18.8% (411) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (16,406) | 8.4% (185) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (32,875) | 14.1% (309) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mesa vs Tappahannock
- A higher percentage of residents in Mesa have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Tappahannock.
- In Tappahannock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 16.4% in Mesa.
- More residents in Mesa have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 8.4% in Tappahannock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mesa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 14.1% in Tappahannock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.