Demographics details for Mesa, AZ vs Water valley, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mesa, AZ vs Water valley, MS.
| Data | Mesa | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 512,498 | 3,361 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $73,766 | $45,718 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Mesa vs Water valley
- In Mesa, the population is higher at 512,498, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
- Residents in Mesa have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 35.8 years in Water valley.
- Mesa has a higher median income of $73,766 compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mesa at 38.0% compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
- Mesa has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- Water valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Mesa.
Demographics
Demographics Mesa vs Water valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mesa | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 49 |
| White | 52 | 49 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mesa vs Water valley
- In Water valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 5% in Mesa.
- Mesa has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 49% in Water valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Mesa at 2% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mesa at 27% compared to 2% in Water valley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mesa at 12% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mesa at 2% compared to 0% in Water valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mesa | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mesa vs Water valley
- In Water valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 17.8% in Mesa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Water valley at 22.0% versus 20.4% in Mesa.
- Water valley has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 15.8% in Mesa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mesa at 17.8% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
- Water valley has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 31.6% in Mesa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Water valley at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Mesa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mesa | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (6,008) | 1.0% (34) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (70,489) | 24.0% (805) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (60,898) | 13.0% (437) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (102,124) | 9.6% (322) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mesa vs Water valley
- A higher percentage of residents in Mesa have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Water valley.
- In Water valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.0% compared to 13.8% in Mesa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Water valley at 13.0%, compared to 11.9% in Mesa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mesa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.