Demographics details for Mesa, AZ vs New riegel, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mesa, AZ vs New riegel, OH.
| Data | Mesa | New riegel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 512,498 | 282 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 32.3 years |
| Median Income | $73,766 | $57,500 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Mesa vs New riegel
- In Mesa, the population is higher at 512,498, compared to 282 in New riegel.
- Residents in Mesa have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 32.3 years in New riegel.
- Mesa has a higher median income of $73,766 compared to $57,500 in New riegel.
- In New riegel, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 38.0% in Mesa.
- Mesa has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 6% in New riegel.
- The unemployment rate in Mesa is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in New riegel.
Demographics
Demographics Mesa vs New riegel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mesa | New riegel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 52 | 69 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 10 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mesa vs New riegel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mesa at 5% compared to 0% in New riegel.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New riegel at 69% compared to 52% in Mesa.
- The Asian population is larger in Mesa at 2% compared to 0% in New riegel.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mesa at 27% compared to 21% in New riegel.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mesa at 12% compared to 10% in New riegel.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mesa at 2% compared to 0% in New riegel.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mesa | New riegel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mesa vs New riegel
- More residents in Mesa report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.3% in New riegel.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New riegel at 22.8% versus 20.4% in Mesa.
- New riegel has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 15.8% in Mesa.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New riegel at 19.4% compared to 17.8% in Mesa.
- New riegel has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 31.6% in Mesa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New riegel at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Mesa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mesa | New riegel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (6,008) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (70,489) | 27.7% (78) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (60,898) | 12.8% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (102,124) | 11.3% (32) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mesa vs New riegel
- A higher percentage of residents in Mesa have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in New riegel.
- In New riegel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.7% compared to 13.8% in Mesa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New riegel at 12.8%, compared to 11.9% in Mesa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mesa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 11.3% in New riegel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.