Demographics details for Mesa, AZ vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mesa, AZ vs Central city, KY.
| Data | Mesa | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 512,498 | 5,810 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $73,766 | $52,184 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mesa vs Central city
- In Mesa, the population is higher at 512,498, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
- Residents in Mesa have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Mesa has a higher median income of $73,766 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Mesa and Central city at 38.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 11% in Mesa.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Mesa and Central city at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Mesa vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mesa | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 3 |
| White | 52 | 88 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 6 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mesa vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mesa at 5% compared to 3% in Central city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 52% in Mesa.
- The Asian population is larger in Mesa at 2% compared to 0% in Central city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mesa at 27% compared to 2% in Central city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mesa at 12% compared to 6% in Central city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mesa at 2% compared to 1% in Central city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mesa | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mesa vs Central city
- In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.8% in Mesa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 20.4% in Mesa.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 15.8% in Mesa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mesa at 17.8% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 31.6% in Mesa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Mesa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mesa | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (6,008) | 1.1% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (70,489) | 15.4% (897) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (60,898) | 15.6% (905) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (102,124) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mesa vs Central city
- A higher percentage of residents in Mesa have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.1% in Central city.
- In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.4% compared to 13.8% in Mesa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 11.9% in Mesa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mesa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.