Demographics details for Merrimac, WI vs Piffard, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Merrimac, WI vs Piffard, NY.
| Data | Merrimac | Piffard |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 526 | 248 |
| Median Age | 38.0 years | 69.3 years |
| Median Income | $86,250 | $49,052 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Merrimac vs Piffard
- In Merrimac, the population is higher at 526, compared to 248 in Piffard.
- The median age in Piffard is higher at 69.3 years, compared to 38.0 years in Merrimac.
- Merrimac has a higher median income of $86,250 compared to $49,052 in Piffard.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Merrimac at 34.0% compared to 31.0% in Piffard.
- The poverty level is higher in Piffard at 8%, compared to 5% in Merrimac.
- The unemployment rate in Merrimac is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Piffard.
Demographics
Demographics Merrimac vs Piffard provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Merrimac | Piffard |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 84 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Merrimac vs Piffard
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Merrimac at 4% compared to 0% in Piffard.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Piffard at 100% compared to 84% in Merrimac.
- Both Merrimac and Piffard have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Merrimac at 8% compared to 0% in Piffard.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Merrimac at 4% compared to 0% in Piffard.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Merrimac and Piffard at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Merrimac | Piffard |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 27.4% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 25.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.0% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 33.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Merrimac vs Piffard
- In Piffard, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 14.8% in Merrimac.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Piffard at 27.4% versus 23.6% in Merrimac.
- Piffard has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 14.6% in Merrimac.
- Binge drinking is more common in Merrimac at 24.0% compared to 18.0% in Piffard.
- Piffard has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 36.1% in Merrimac.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Piffard at 33.0% compared to 17.0% in Merrimac.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Merrimac | Piffard |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.5% (31) |
| High School Diploma | 20.2% (106) | 21.0% (52) |
| Less than High School | 22.8% (120) | 25.0% (62) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.1% (111) | 14.1% (35) |
Education Levels Comparison: Merrimac vs Piffard
- In Piffard, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in Merrimac.
- In Piffard, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 20.2% in Merrimac.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Piffard at 25.0%, compared to 22.8% in Merrimac.
- A higher percentage of residents in Merrimac hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.1% compared to 14.1% in Piffard.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.