Demographics details for Merrill, MI vs Picayune, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Merrill, MI vs Picayune, MS.
Data | Merrill | Picayune |
---|---|---|
Population | 678 | 11,826 |
Median Age | 38.4 years | 38.3 years |
Median Income | $43,523 | $35,649 |
Married Families | 55.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 21% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Merrill vs Picayune
- The population in Picayune is higher at 11,826, compared to 678 in Merrill.
- Residents in Merrill have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 38.3 years in Picayune.
- Merrill has a higher median income of $43,523 compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Merrill at 55.0% compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 12% in Merrill.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Merrill and Picayune at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Merrill vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Merrill | Picayune |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 38 |
White | 30 | 55 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 38 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 31 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Merrill vs Picayune
- In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 1% in Merrill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Picayune at 55% compared to 30% in Merrill.
- Both Merrill and Picayune have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Merrill at 38% compared to 2% in Picayune.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Merrill at 31% compared to 5% in Picayune.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Merrill and Picayune at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Merrill | Picayune |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 14.3% |
Depression | 24.6% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 23.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 13.3% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 44.0% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Merrill vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.6% in Merrill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Merrill at 24.6% compared to 24.0% in Picayune.
- Picayune has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 18.2% in Merrill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Merrill at 18.4% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 40.0% in Merrill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 19.0% in Merrill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Merrill | Picayune |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (73) |
High School Diploma | 48.5% (329) | 17.8% (2,108) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (40) | 11.8% (1,392) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (74) | 10.1% (1,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Merrill vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Merrill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Merrill hold a high school diploma at 48.5% compared to 17.8% in Picayune.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Picayune at 11.8%, compared to 5.9% in Merrill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Merrill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.