Demographics details for Meridian, ID vs Woodburn, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meridian, ID vs Woodburn, OR.
| Data | Meridian | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 129,736 | 27,290 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 39.2 years |
| Median Income | $93,296 | $58,916 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Meridian vs Woodburn
- In Meridian, the population is higher at 129,736, compared to 27,290 in Woodburn.
- The median age in Woodburn is higher at 39.2 years, compared to 37.1 years in Meridian.
- Meridian has a higher median income of $93,296 compared to $58,916 in Woodburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Meridian at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Woodburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodburn at 12%, compared to 7% in Meridian.
- Woodburn has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.4% in Meridian.
Demographics
Demographics Meridian vs Woodburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Meridian | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 82 | 22 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 59 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Meridian vs Woodburn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Meridian at 1% compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- Meridian has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 22% in Woodburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Meridian at 2% compared to 1% in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 59%, compared to 8% in Meridian.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodburn at 17%, compared to 7% in Meridian.
- In Woodburn, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Meridian.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Meridian | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meridian vs Woodburn
- In Woodburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.0% in Meridian.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodburn at 27.1% versus 25.9% in Meridian.
- Woodburn has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 12.7% in Meridian.
- Binge drinking is more common in Meridian at 16.9% compared to 14.4% in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 28.6% in Meridian.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodburn at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Meridian.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Meridian | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (321) | 3.6% (992) |
| High School Diploma | 9.3% (12,075) | 13.3% (3,628) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (5,670) | 38.2% (10,414) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.2% (33,934) | 9.4% (2,578) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meridian vs Woodburn
- In Woodburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.2% in Meridian.
- In Woodburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.3% compared to 9.3% in Meridian.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodburn at 38.2%, compared to 4.4% in Meridian.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meridian hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 9.4% in Woodburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.