Demographics details for Meriden, CT vs Central city, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meriden, CT vs Central city, NE.
Data | Meriden | Central city |
---|---|---|
Population | 60,242 | 3,078 |
Median Age | 40.2 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $63,671 | $54,063 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Meriden vs Central city
- In Meriden, the population is higher at 60,242, compared to 3,078 in Central city.
- Residents in Meriden have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 37.0 years in Central city.
- Meriden has a higher median income of $63,671 compared to $54,063 in Central city.
- In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Meriden.
- Meriden has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Central city.
- The unemployment rate in Meriden is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Meriden vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Meriden | Central city |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | Data is updating |
White | 38 | 86 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 37 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Meriden vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Meriden at 8% compared to 0% in Central city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 86% compared to 38% in Meriden.
- In Central city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Meriden.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Meriden at 37% compared to 7% in Central city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Meriden at 15% compared to 4% in Central city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Meriden and Central city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Meriden | Central city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 10.1% |
Depression | 20.9% | 18.6% |
Smoking | 16.8% | 17.5% |
Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 20.0% |
Obesity | 32.5% | 44.9% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meriden vs Central city
- More residents in Meriden report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 14.5% in Central city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Meriden at 20.9% compared to 18.6% in Central city.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 16.8% in Meriden.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central city at 20.0% compared to 15.6% in Meriden.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 32.5% in Meriden.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Meriden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Meriden | Central city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (1,003) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 21.6% (13,023) | 23.4% (721) |
Less than High School | 19.8% (11,930) | 5.8% (178) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (8,357) | 13.1% (404) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meriden vs Central city
- A higher percentage of residents in Meriden have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Central city.
- In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 21.6% in Meriden.
- More residents in Meriden have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 5.8% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meriden hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 13.1% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.