Demographics details for Meriden, CT vs Carthage, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meriden, CT vs Carthage, MS.
| Data | Meriden | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,242 | 4,813 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $63,671 | $47,722 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Meriden vs Carthage
- In Meriden, the population is higher at 60,242, compared to 4,813 in Carthage.
- Residents in Meriden have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 36.4 years in Carthage.
- Meriden has a higher median income of $63,671 compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Meriden at 32.0% compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 15%, compared to 10% in Meriden.
- Carthage has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Meriden.
Demographics
Demographics Meriden vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Meriden | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 45 |
| White | 38 | 36 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 37 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Meriden vs Carthage
- In Carthage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 8% in Meriden.
- Meriden has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 36% in Carthage.
- The Asian population is larger in Meriden at 2% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Meriden at 37% compared to 18% in Carthage.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Meriden at 15% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Meriden.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Meriden | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 16.8% | 25.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 12.5% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 46.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meriden vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Meriden.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 21.6% versus 20.9% in Meriden.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 16.8% in Meriden.
- Binge drinking is more common in Meriden at 15.6% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 32.5% in Meriden.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in Meriden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Meriden | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (1,003) | 3.0% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (13,023) | 16.7% (806) |
| Less than High School | 19.8% (11,930) | 16.9% (811) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (8,357) | 12.1% (583) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meriden vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.7% in Meriden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meriden hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 16.7% in Carthage.
- More residents in Meriden have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 16.9% in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meriden hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 12.1% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.