Demographics details for Mercer, PA vs Little suamico, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mercer, PA vs Little suamico, WI.

Data Mercer Little suamico
Population 109,220 4,878
Median Age 45.0 years 41.0 years
Median Income $57,353 $74,800
Married Families 42.0% 56.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Mercer vs Little suamico

  • In Mercer, the population is higher at 109,220, compared to 4,878 in Little suamico.
  • Residents in Mercer have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 41.0 years in Little suamico.
  • Little suamico has a higher median income of $74,800, compared to $57,353 in Mercer.
  • In Little suamico, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 42.0% in Mercer.
  • Mercer has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Little suamico.
  • The unemployment rate in Mercer is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Little suamico.

Demographics

Demographics Mercer vs Little suamico provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mercer Little suamico
Black 6 1
White 87 95
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 2 2
Two or More Races 4 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mercer vs Little suamico

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mercer at 6% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Little suamico at 95% compared to 87% in Mercer.
  • Both Mercer and Little suamico have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Mercer and Little suamico at 2%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Mercer at 4% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mercer and Little suamico at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mercer Little suamico
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% Data is updating%
Depression 23.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 20.1% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.5% Data is updating%
Obesity 40.3% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 18.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mercer vs Little suamico

  • More residents in Mercer report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mercer at 23.7% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mercer at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mercer at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mercer at 40.3% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mercer at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mercer Little suamico
No Schooling 0.6% (662) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 26.5% (28,924) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 13.0% (14,161) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.4% (19,021) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Mercer vs Little suamico

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mercer have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mercer hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • More residents in Mercer have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mercer hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.