Demographics details for Merced, CA vs Clinton, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Merced, CA vs Clinton, SC.
| Data | Merced | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 91,563 | 7,554 |
| Median Age | 29.9 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $59,233 | $38,350 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Merced vs Clinton
- In Merced, the population is higher at 91,563, compared to 7,554 in Clinton.
- The median age in Clinton is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 29.9 years in Merced.
- Merced has a higher median income of $59,233 compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Merced at 28.0% compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- Merced has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 18% in Clinton.
- The unemployment rate in Merced is higher at 8.2%, compared to 4.5% in Clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Merced vs Clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Merced | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 38 |
| White | 18 | 55 |
| Asian | 10 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 57 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Merced vs Clinton
- In Clinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 4% in Merced.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clinton at 55% compared to 18% in Merced.
- The Asian population is larger in Merced at 10% compared to 2% in Clinton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Merced at 57% compared to 1% in Clinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Merced at 10% compared to 4% in Clinton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Merced at 1% compared to 0% in Clinton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Merced | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 19.8% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Merced vs Clinton
- In Clinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.4% in Merced.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clinton at 23.7% versus 19.8% in Merced.
- Clinton has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 17.2% in Merced.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clinton at 15.8% compared to 14.5% in Merced.
- Clinton has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 33.7% in Merced.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Merced.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Merced | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (1,807) | 1.0% (74) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (11,246) | 19.3% (1,460) |
| Less than High School | 24.2% (22,176) | 15.6% (1,177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (8,562) | 17.3% (1,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Merced vs Clinton
- A higher percentage of residents in Merced have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.0% in Clinton.
- In Clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 12.3% in Merced.
- More residents in Merced have less than a high school education at 24.2% compared to 15.6% in Clinton.
- In Clinton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 9.4% in Merced.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.