Demographics details for Mentor, MN vs Pahrump, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mentor, MN vs Pahrump, NV.
| Data | Mentor | Pahrump |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 105 | 44,711 |
| Median Age | 52.5 years | 53.7 years |
| Median Income | $39,583 | $54,988 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Mentor vs Pahrump
- The population in Pahrump is higher at 44,711, compared to 105 in Mentor.
- The median age in Pahrump is higher at 53.7 years, compared to 52.5 years in Mentor.
- Pahrump has a higher median income of $54,988, compared to $39,583 in Mentor.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mentor at 54.0% compared to 45.0% in Pahrump.
- The poverty level is higher in Pahrump at 10%, compared to 0% in Mentor.
- Pahrump has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 2.5% in Mentor.
Demographics
Demographics Mentor vs Pahrump provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mentor | Pahrump |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 100 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 16 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mentor vs Pahrump
- In Pahrump, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Mentor.
- Mentor has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 69% in Pahrump.
- In Pahrump, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Mentor.
- Pahrump has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 0% in Mentor.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pahrump at 10%, compared to 0% in Mentor.
- In Pahrump, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mentor.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mentor | Pahrump |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 23.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.8% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mentor vs Pahrump
- In Pahrump, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 15.5% in Mentor.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.4%.
- Pahrump has a higher smoking rate at 23.0% compared to 19.6% in Mentor.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mentor at 21.8% compared to 15.9% in Pahrump.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mentor at 39.7% compared to 38.5% in Pahrump.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 19.0% in Mentor.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mentor | Pahrump |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (507) |
| High School Diploma | 43.8% (46) | 23.0% (10,287) |
| Less than High School | 30.5% (32) | 20.5% (9,157) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.7% (7) | 10.1% (4,495) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mentor vs Pahrump
- In Pahrump, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Mentor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mentor hold a high school diploma at 43.8% compared to 23.0% in Pahrump.
- More residents in Mentor have less than a high school education at 30.5% compared to 20.5% in Pahrump.
- In Pahrump, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 6.7% in Mentor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.