Demographics details for Mentor, MN vs Greensboro, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mentor, MN vs Greensboro, NC.
| Data | Mentor | Greensboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 105 | 301,115 |
| Median Age | 52.5 years | 34.0 years |
| Median Income | $39,583 | $55,051 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Mentor vs Greensboro
- The population in Greensboro is higher at 301,115, compared to 105 in Mentor.
- Residents in Mentor have a higher median age of 52.5 years compared to 34.0 years in Greensboro.
- Greensboro has a higher median income of $55,051, compared to $39,583 in Mentor.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mentor at 54.0% compared to 29.0% in Greensboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Greensboro at 14%, compared to 0% in Mentor.
- Greensboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.5% in Mentor.
Demographics
Demographics Mentor vs Greensboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mentor | Greensboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 42 |
| White | 100 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 9 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mentor vs Greensboro
- In Greensboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 0% in Mentor.
- Mentor has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 38% in Greensboro.
- In Greensboro, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Mentor.
- Greensboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Mentor.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Greensboro at 6%, compared to 0% in Mentor.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mentor and Greensboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mentor | Greensboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.8% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mentor vs Greensboro
- In Greensboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.5% in Mentor.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mentor at 24.4% compared to 22.2% in Greensboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mentor at 19.6% compared to 15.6% in Greensboro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mentor at 21.8% compared to 15.5% in Greensboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mentor at 39.7% compared to 36.5% in Greensboro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mentor at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Greensboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mentor | Greensboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (3,655) |
| High School Diploma | 43.8% (46) | 11.5% (34,595) |
| Less than High School | 30.5% (32) | 8.9% (26,682) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.7% (7) | 25.2% (75,909) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mentor vs Greensboro
- In Greensboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Mentor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mentor hold a high school diploma at 43.8% compared to 11.5% in Greensboro.
- More residents in Mentor have less than a high school education at 30.5% compared to 8.9% in Greensboro.
- In Greensboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.2% compared to 6.7% in Mentor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.