Demographics details for Menomonee falls, WI vs South gate, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Menomonee falls, WI vs South gate, CA.

Data Menomonee falls South gate
Population 39,246 90,926
Median Age 41.9 years 33.7 years
Median Income $96,986 $67,188
Married Families 46.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 5% 18%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 6.1

Population Comparison: Menomonee falls vs South gate

  • The population in South gate is higher at 90,926, compared to 39,246 in Menomonee falls.
  • Residents in Menomonee falls have a higher median age of 41.9 years compared to 33.7 years in South gate.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher median income of $96,986 compared to $67,188 in South gate.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Menomonee falls at 46.0% compared to 34.0% in South gate.
  • The poverty level is higher in South gate at 18%, compared to 5% in Menomonee falls.
  • South gate has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 2.8% in Menomonee falls.

Demographics

Demographics Menomonee falls vs South gate provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Menomonee falls South gate
Black 4 1
White 82 -21
Asian 5 1
Hispanic 5 97
Two or More Races 4 21
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Menomonee falls vs South gate

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Menomonee falls at 4% compared to 1% in South gate.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to -21% in South gate.
  • The Asian population is larger in Menomonee falls at 5% compared to 1% in South gate.
  • South gate has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 5% in Menomonee falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South gate at 21%, compared to 4% in Menomonee falls.
  • In South gate, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Menomonee falls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Menomonee falls South gate
Mental Health Not Good 12.7% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 7.7% 14.9%
Depression 20.0% 16.3%
Smoking 11.6% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 25.0% 14.5%
Obesity 33.4% 34.1%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Menomonee falls vs South gate

  • In South gate, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 12.7% in Menomonee falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Menomonee falls at 20.0% compared to 16.3% in South gate.
  • South gate has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 11.6% in Menomonee falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Menomonee falls at 25.0% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
  • South gate has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 33.4% in Menomonee falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Menomonee falls at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in South gate.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Menomonee falls South gate
No Schooling 0.3% (117) 4.6% (4,160)
High School Diploma 14.9% (5,834) 14.9% (13,536)
Less than High School 4.9% (1,936) 53.3% (48,481)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.4% (13,122) 7.5% (6,822)

Education Levels Comparison: Menomonee falls vs South gate

  • In South gate, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.3% in Menomonee falls.
  • Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 14.9%.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South gate at 53.3%, compared to 4.9% in Menomonee falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Menomonee falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 7.5% in South gate.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.