Demographics details for Menomonee falls, WI vs Mcdonough, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Menomonee falls, WI vs Mcdonough, GA.

Data Menomonee falls Mcdonough
Population 39,246 30,340
Median Age 41.9 years 31.0 years
Median Income $96,986 $77,804
Married Families 46.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 5% 13%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 5.9

Population Comparison: Menomonee falls vs Mcdonough

  • In Menomonee falls, the population is higher at 39,246, compared to 30,340 in Mcdonough.
  • Residents in Menomonee falls have a higher median age of 41.9 years compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher median income of $96,986 compared to $77,804 in Mcdonough.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Menomonee falls at 46.0% compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mcdonough at 13%, compared to 5% in Menomonee falls.
  • Mcdonough has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 2.8% in Menomonee falls.

Demographics

Demographics Menomonee falls vs Mcdonough provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Menomonee falls Mcdonough
Black 4 70
White 82 14
Asian 5 2
Hispanic 5 6
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Menomonee falls vs Mcdonough

  • In Mcdonough, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 4% in Menomonee falls.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
  • The Asian population is larger in Menomonee falls at 5% compared to 2% in Mcdonough.
  • Mcdonough has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Menomonee falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mcdonough at 8%, compared to 4% in Menomonee falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Menomonee falls and Mcdonough at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Menomonee falls Mcdonough
Mental Health Not Good 12.7% 16.4%
Physical Health Not Good 7.7% 11.6%
Depression 20.0% 19.6%
Smoking 11.6% 16.1%
Binge Drinking 25.0% 15.1%
Obesity 33.4% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Menomonee falls vs Mcdonough

  • In Mcdonough, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 12.7% in Menomonee falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Menomonee falls at 20.0% compared to 19.6% in Mcdonough.
  • Mcdonough has a higher smoking rate at 16.1% compared to 11.6% in Menomonee falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Menomonee falls at 25.0% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
  • Mcdonough has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 33.4% in Menomonee falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Menomonee falls at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Menomonee falls Mcdonough
No Schooling 0.3% (117) 0.7% (221)
High School Diploma 14.9% (5,834) 14.8% (4,501)
Less than High School 4.9% (1,936) 4.9% (1,500)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.4% (13,122) 16.1% (4,882)

Education Levels Comparison: Menomonee falls vs Mcdonough

  • In Mcdonough, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Menomonee falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Menomonee falls hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 14.8% in Mcdonough.
  • Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 4.9%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Menomonee falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.