Demographics details for Menomonee falls, WI vs Freeport, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Menomonee falls, WI vs Freeport, IL.

Data Menomonee falls Freeport
Population 39,246 23,413
Median Age 41.9 years 43.4 years
Median Income $96,986 $44,658
Married Families 46.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 2.8 6.9

Population Comparison: Menomonee falls vs Freeport

  • In Menomonee falls, the population is higher at 39,246, compared to 23,413 in Freeport.
  • The median age in Freeport is higher at 43.4 years, compared to 41.9 years in Menomonee falls.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher median income of $96,986 compared to $44,658 in Freeport.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Menomonee falls at 46.0% compared to 35.0% in Freeport.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Freeport.
  • Freeport has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 2.8% in Menomonee falls.

Demographics

Demographics Menomonee falls vs Freeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Menomonee falls Freeport
Black 4 14
White 82 68
Asian 5 2
Hispanic 5 6
Two or More Races 4 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Menomonee falls vs Freeport

  • In Freeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 4% in Menomonee falls.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 68% in Freeport.
  • The Asian population is larger in Menomonee falls at 5% compared to 2% in Freeport.
  • Freeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Menomonee falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Freeport at 10%, compared to 4% in Menomonee falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Menomonee falls and Freeport at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Menomonee falls Freeport
Mental Health Not Good 12.7% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 7.7% 12.9%
Depression 20.0% 22.3%
Smoking 11.6% 20.6%
Binge Drinking 25.0% 15.9%
Obesity 33.4% 40.8%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Menomonee falls vs Freeport

  • In Freeport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 12.7% in Menomonee falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Freeport at 22.3% versus 20.0% in Menomonee falls.
  • Freeport has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 11.6% in Menomonee falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Menomonee falls at 25.0% compared to 15.9% in Freeport.
  • Freeport has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 33.4% in Menomonee falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Freeport at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Menomonee falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Menomonee falls Freeport
No Schooling 0.3% (117) 0.9% (206)
High School Diploma 14.9% (5,834) 19.8% (4,646)
Less than High School 4.9% (1,936) 12.2% (2,845)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.4% (13,122) 12.9% (3,011)

Education Levels Comparison: Menomonee falls vs Freeport

  • In Freeport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Menomonee falls.
  • In Freeport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 14.9% in Menomonee falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Freeport at 12.2%, compared to 4.9% in Menomonee falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Menomonee falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 12.9% in Freeport.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.