Demographics details for Mendenhall, MS vs Waterloo, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mendenhall, MS vs Waterloo, AL.
Data | Mendenhall | Waterloo |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,148 | 183 |
Median Age | 39.0 years | 59.0 years |
Median Income | $35,956 | $38,750 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mendenhall vs Waterloo
- In Mendenhall, the population is higher at 2,148, compared to 183 in Waterloo.
- The median age in Waterloo is higher at 59.0 years, compared to 39.0 years in Mendenhall.
- Waterloo has a higher median income of $38,750, compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mendenhall at 31.0% compared to 29.0% in Waterloo.
- Mendenhall has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 13% in Waterloo.
- The unemployment rate in Mendenhall is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.5% in Waterloo.
Demographics
Demographics Mendenhall vs Waterloo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mendenhall | Waterloo |
---|---|---|
Black | 65 | Data is updating |
White | 34 | 97 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Waterloo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mendenhall at 65% compared to 0% in Waterloo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Waterloo at 97% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
- Both Mendenhall and Waterloo have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Waterloo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
- Both Mendenhall and Waterloo have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mendenhall and Waterloo at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mendenhall | Waterloo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 20.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 14.3% |
Depression | 24.8% | 27.6% |
Smoking | 24.5% | 23.1% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 46.3% | 38.8% |
Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Waterloo
- In Waterloo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 19.1% in Mendenhall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waterloo at 27.6% versus 24.8% in Mendenhall.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.5% compared to 23.1% in Waterloo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Waterloo at 15.9% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mendenhall at 46.3% compared to 38.8% in Waterloo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 21.0% in Waterloo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mendenhall | Waterloo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (16) | 0.5% (1) |
High School Diploma | 17.9% (385) | 10.4% (19) |
Less than High School | 20.7% (445) | 23.0% (42) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (395) | 4.9% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mendenhall vs Waterloo
- A higher percentage of residents in Mendenhall have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Waterloo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mendenhall hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 10.4% in Waterloo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waterloo at 23.0%, compared to 20.7% in Mendenhall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mendenhall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 4.9% in Waterloo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.