Demographics details for Mendenhall, MS vs Somers, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mendenhall, MS vs Somers, MT.
Data | Mendenhall | Somers |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,148 | 1,037 |
Median Age | 39.0 years | 64.2 years |
Median Income | $35,956 | $54,466 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 67.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mendenhall vs Somers
- In Mendenhall, the population is higher at 2,148, compared to 1,037 in Somers.
- The median age in Somers is higher at 64.2 years, compared to 39.0 years in Mendenhall.
- Somers has a higher median income of $54,466, compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
- In Somers, the percentage of married families is higher at 67.0%, compared to 31.0% in Mendenhall.
- Mendenhall has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 9% in Somers.
- The unemployment rate in Mendenhall is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.5% in Somers.
Demographics
Demographics Mendenhall vs Somers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mendenhall | Somers |
---|---|---|
Black | 65 | Data is updating |
White | 34 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 1 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Somers
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mendenhall at 65% compared to 0% in Somers.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Somers at 100% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
- Both Mendenhall and Somers have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Mendenhall and Somers at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mendenhall at 1% compared to 0% in Somers.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mendenhall and Somers at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mendenhall | Somers |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 10.2% |
Depression | 24.8% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 24.5% | 15.0% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 21.1% |
Obesity | 46.3% | 31.4% |
Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 61.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Somers
- More residents in Mendenhall report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.2% in Somers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.8% compared to 22.0% in Somers.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.5% compared to 15.0% in Somers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Somers at 21.1% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mendenhall at 46.3% compared to 31.4% in Somers.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Somers at 61.0% compared to 30.0% in Mendenhall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mendenhall | Somers |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (16) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.9% (385) | 30.6% (317) |
Less than High School | 20.7% (445) | 46.3% (480) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (395) | 23.4% (243) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mendenhall vs Somers
- A higher percentage of residents in Mendenhall have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Somers.
- In Somers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.6% compared to 17.9% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Somers at 46.3%, compared to 20.7% in Mendenhall.
- In Somers, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 18.4% in Mendenhall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.