Demographics details for Mendenhall, MS vs Pompton lakes, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mendenhall, MS vs Pompton lakes, NJ.

Data Mendenhall Pompton lakes
Population 2,148 10,907
Median Age 39.0 years 39.1 years
Median Income $35,956 $113,781
Married Families 31.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 20% 6%
Unemployment Rate 5.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Mendenhall vs Pompton lakes

  • The population in Pompton lakes is higher at 10,907, compared to 2,148 in Mendenhall.
  • The median age in Pompton lakes is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 39.0 years in Mendenhall.
  • Pompton lakes has a higher median income of $113,781, compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
  • In Pompton lakes, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 31.0% in Mendenhall.
  • Mendenhall has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 6% in Pompton lakes.
  • The unemployment rate in Mendenhall is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.2% in Pompton lakes.

Demographics

Demographics Mendenhall vs Pompton lakes provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mendenhall Pompton lakes
Black 65 1
White 34 68
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic Data is updating 17
Two or More Races 1 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Pompton lakes

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mendenhall at 65% compared to 1% in Pompton lakes.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pompton lakes at 68% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
  • In Pompton lakes, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Mendenhall.
  • Pompton lakes has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pompton lakes at 8%, compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mendenhall and Pompton lakes at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mendenhall Pompton lakes
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 14.6% 9.0%
Depression 24.8% 17.8%
Smoking 24.5% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 13.7% 19.0%
Obesity 46.3% 26.1%
Disability Percentage 30.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Pompton lakes

  • More residents in Mendenhall report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 14.2% in Pompton lakes.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.8% compared to 17.8% in Pompton lakes.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.5% compared to 11.5% in Pompton lakes.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Pompton lakes at 19.0% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mendenhall at 46.3% compared to 26.1% in Pompton lakes.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 8.0% in Pompton lakes.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mendenhall Pompton lakes
No Schooling 0.7% (16) 0.2% (27)
High School Diploma 17.9% (385) 20.1% (2,192)
Less than High School 20.7% (445) 7.3% (793)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (395) 28.9% (3,153)

Education Levels Comparison: Mendenhall vs Pompton lakes

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mendenhall have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Pompton lakes.
  • In Pompton lakes, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.1% compared to 17.9% in Mendenhall.
  • More residents in Mendenhall have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 7.3% in Pompton lakes.
  • In Pompton lakes, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 18.4% in Mendenhall.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.