Demographics details for Mendenhall, MS vs Lagrange, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mendenhall, MS vs Lagrange, GA.
Data | Mendenhall | Lagrange |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,148 | 31,773 |
Median Age | 39.0 years | 34.9 years |
Median Income | $35,956 | $41,030 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Mendenhall vs Lagrange
- The population in Lagrange is higher at 31,773, compared to 2,148 in Mendenhall.
- Residents in Mendenhall have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 34.9 years in Lagrange.
- Lagrange has a higher median income of $41,030, compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mendenhall at 31.0% compared to 28.0% in Lagrange.
- Mendenhall has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 15% in Lagrange.
- The unemployment rate in Mendenhall is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.0% in Lagrange.
Demographics
Demographics Mendenhall vs Lagrange provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mendenhall | Lagrange |
---|---|---|
Black | 65 | 51 |
White | 34 | 38 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Lagrange
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mendenhall at 65% compared to 51% in Lagrange.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lagrange at 38% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
- In Lagrange, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Mendenhall.
- Lagrange has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lagrange at 3%, compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mendenhall and Lagrange at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mendenhall | Lagrange |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 15.0% |
Depression | 24.8% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 24.5% | 22.1% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 13.6% |
Obesity | 46.3% | 46.7% |
Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Lagrange
- In Lagrange, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 19.1% in Mendenhall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.8% compared to 22.0% in Lagrange.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.5% compared to 22.1% in Lagrange.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mendenhall at 13.7% compared to 13.6% in Lagrange.
- Lagrange has higher obesity rates at 46.7% compared to 46.3% in Mendenhall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 15.0% in Lagrange.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mendenhall | Lagrange |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (16) | 1.0% (314) |
High School Diploma | 17.9% (385) | 19.7% (6,259) |
Less than High School | 20.7% (445) | 11.9% (3,776) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (395) | 14.7% (4,682) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mendenhall vs Lagrange
- In Lagrange, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Mendenhall.
- In Lagrange, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 17.9% in Mendenhall.
- More residents in Mendenhall have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 11.9% in Lagrange.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mendenhall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 14.7% in Lagrange.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.