Demographics details for Mendenhall, MS vs Graceville, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mendenhall, MS vs Graceville, FL.

Data Mendenhall Graceville
Population 2,148 2,175
Median Age 39.0 years 31.7 years
Median Income $35,956 $36,625
Married Families 31.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 20% 18%
Unemployment Rate 5.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Mendenhall vs Graceville

  • The population in Graceville is higher at 2,175, compared to 2,148 in Mendenhall.
  • Residents in Mendenhall have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
  • Graceville has a higher median income of $36,625, compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
  • In Graceville, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 31.0% in Mendenhall.
  • Mendenhall has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 18% in Graceville.
  • The unemployment rate in Mendenhall is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.2% in Graceville.

Demographics

Demographics Mendenhall vs Graceville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mendenhall Graceville
Black 65 32
White 34 59
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 6
Two or More Races 1 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Graceville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mendenhall at 65% compared to 32% in Graceville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Graceville at 59% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
  • In Graceville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Mendenhall.
  • Graceville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Graceville at 2%, compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mendenhall and Graceville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mendenhall Graceville
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 14.6% 13.2%
Depression 24.8% 22.2%
Smoking 24.5% 24.4%
Binge Drinking 13.7% 15.8%
Obesity 46.3% 33.6%
Disability Percentage 30.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Graceville

  • More residents in Mendenhall report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.6% in Graceville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.8% compared to 22.2% in Graceville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.5% compared to 24.4% in Graceville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Graceville at 15.8% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mendenhall at 46.3% compared to 33.6% in Graceville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 18.0% in Graceville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mendenhall Graceville
No Schooling 0.7% (16) 2.7% (58)
High School Diploma 17.9% (385) 25.3% (550)
Less than High School 20.7% (445) 22.5% (490)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (395) 15.2% (331)

Education Levels Comparison: Mendenhall vs Graceville

  • In Graceville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.7% in Mendenhall.
  • In Graceville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 17.9% in Mendenhall.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Graceville at 22.5%, compared to 20.7% in Mendenhall.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mendenhall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 15.2% in Graceville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.