Demographics details for Mendenhall, MS vs Fairmont, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mendenhall, MS vs Fairmont, NC.
| Data | Mendenhall | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,148 | 2,188 |
| Median Age | 39.0 years | 48.1 years |
| Median Income | $35,956 | $31,731 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Mendenhall vs Fairmont
- The population in Fairmont is higher at 2,188, compared to 2,148 in Mendenhall.
- The median age in Fairmont is higher at 48.1 years, compared to 39.0 years in Mendenhall.
- Mendenhall has a higher median income of $35,956 compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mendenhall at 31.0% compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairmont at 22%, compared to 20% in Mendenhall.
- The unemployment rate in Mendenhall is higher at 5.5%, compared to 5.0% in Fairmont.
Demographics
Demographics Mendenhall vs Fairmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mendenhall | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 65 | 62 |
| White | 34 | 14 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 23 |
Demographics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Fairmont
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mendenhall at 65% compared to 62% in Fairmont.
- Mendenhall has a higher percentage of White residents at 34% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- Both Mendenhall and Fairmont have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Mendenhall and Fairmont at 0%.
- Both Mendenhall and Fairmont have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
- In Fairmont, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 23%, compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mendenhall | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 16.4% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 24.5% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 46.3% | 47.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 19.1% in Mendenhall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.8% compared to 22.6% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 24.5% in Mendenhall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mendenhall at 13.7% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has higher obesity rates at 47.2% compared to 46.3% in Mendenhall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 27.0% in Fairmont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mendenhall | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (16) | 0.3% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (385) | 27.5% (602) |
| Less than High School | 20.7% (445) | 12.9% (282) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (395) | 14.4% (316) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mendenhall vs Fairmont
- A higher percentage of residents in Mendenhall have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Fairmont.
- In Fairmont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 17.9% in Mendenhall.
- More residents in Mendenhall have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 12.9% in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mendenhall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 14.4% in Fairmont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.