Demographics details for Mendenhall, MS vs Edmonds, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mendenhall, MS vs Edmonds, WA.
| Data | Mendenhall | Edmonds |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,148 | 42,593 |
| Median Age | 39.0 years | 45.8 years |
| Median Income | $35,956 | $110,057 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Mendenhall vs Edmonds
- The population in Edmonds is higher at 42,593, compared to 2,148 in Mendenhall.
- The median age in Edmonds is higher at 45.8 years, compared to 39.0 years in Mendenhall.
- Edmonds has a higher median income of $110,057, compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
- In Edmonds, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 31.0% in Mendenhall.
- Mendenhall has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 0% in Edmonds.
- The unemployment rate in Mendenhall is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.7% in Edmonds.
Demographics
Demographics Mendenhall vs Edmonds provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mendenhall | Edmonds |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 65 | 2 |
| White | 34 | 75 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Edmonds
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mendenhall at 65% compared to 2% in Edmonds.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Edmonds at 75% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
- In Edmonds, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Mendenhall.
- Edmonds has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Edmonds at 8%, compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mendenhall and Edmonds at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mendenhall | Edmonds |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 15.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 28.1% |
| Smoking | 24.5% | 9.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 46.3% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Edmonds
- More residents in Mendenhall report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.3% in Edmonds.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Edmonds at 28.1% versus 24.8% in Mendenhall.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.5% compared to 9.6% in Edmonds.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Edmonds at 16.4% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mendenhall at 46.3% compared to 31.0% in Edmonds.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 12.0% in Edmonds.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mendenhall | Edmonds |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (16) | 0.5% (232) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (385) | 11.0% (4,689) |
| Less than High School | 20.7% (445) | 4.1% (1,747) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (395) | 38.7% (16,493) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mendenhall vs Edmonds
- A higher percentage of residents in Mendenhall have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Edmonds.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mendenhall hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 11.0% in Edmonds.
- More residents in Mendenhall have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 4.1% in Edmonds.
- In Edmonds, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.7% compared to 18.4% in Mendenhall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.