Demographics details for Mendenhall, MS vs Clayton, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mendenhall, MS vs Clayton, NC.
| Data | Mendenhall | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,148 | 29,445 |
| Median Age | 39.0 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $35,956 | $71,698 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Mendenhall vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 29,445, compared to 2,148 in Mendenhall.
- Residents in Mendenhall have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698, compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Mendenhall.
- Mendenhall has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Mendenhall is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.7% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Mendenhall vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mendenhall | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 65 | 22 |
| White | 34 | 59 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mendenhall at 65% compared to 22% in Clayton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 59% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
- In Clayton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Mendenhall.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mendenhall and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mendenhall | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 24.5% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 46.3% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Clayton
- More residents in Mendenhall report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.8% compared to 23.1% in Clayton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.5% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 17.6% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mendenhall at 46.3% compared to 39.9% in Clayton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mendenhall | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (16) | 0.7% (210) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (385) | 12.6% (3,700) |
| Less than High School | 20.7% (445) | 5.4% (1,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (395) | 18.6% (5,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mendenhall vs Clayton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Mendenhall and Clayton at 0.7%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mendenhall hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- More residents in Mendenhall have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 18.4% in Mendenhall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.