Demographics details for Mendenhall, MS vs Angleton, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mendenhall, MS vs Angleton, TX.
Data | Mendenhall | Angleton |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,148 | 19,610 |
Median Age | 39.0 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $35,956 | $77,235 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Mendenhall vs Angleton
- The population in Angleton is higher at 19,610, compared to 2,148 in Mendenhall.
- Residents in Mendenhall have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 37.4 years in Angleton.
- Angleton has a higher median income of $77,235, compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
- In Angleton, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Mendenhall.
- Mendenhall has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in Angleton.
- The unemployment rate in Mendenhall is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.5% in Angleton.
Demographics
Demographics Mendenhall vs Angleton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mendenhall | Angleton |
---|---|---|
Black | 65 | 10 |
White | 34 | 46 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 28 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Angleton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mendenhall at 65% compared to 10% in Angleton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Angleton at 46% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
- In Angleton, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Mendenhall.
- Angleton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 28%, compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Angleton at 13%, compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mendenhall and Angleton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mendenhall | Angleton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 17.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 12.4% |
Depression | 24.8% | 22.4% |
Smoking | 24.5% | 17.8% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 46.3% | 40.6% |
Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mendenhall vs Angleton
- More residents in Mendenhall report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.4% in Angleton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.8% compared to 22.4% in Angleton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mendenhall at 24.5% compared to 17.8% in Angleton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Angleton at 19.0% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mendenhall at 46.3% compared to 40.6% in Angleton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 16.0% in Angleton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mendenhall | Angleton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (16) | 0.7% (139) |
High School Diploma | 17.9% (385) | 19.5% (3,827) |
Less than High School | 20.7% (445) | 12.3% (2,414) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (395) | 12.8% (2,507) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mendenhall vs Angleton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Mendenhall and Angleton at 0.7%.
- In Angleton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.5% compared to 17.9% in Mendenhall.
- More residents in Mendenhall have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 12.3% in Angleton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mendenhall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 12.8% in Angleton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.