Demographics details for Menahga, MN vs Graham, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Menahga, MN vs Graham, NC.
| Data | Menahga | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,344 | 17,856 |
| Median Age | 44.2 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $54,167 | $51,482 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Menahga vs Graham
- The population in Graham is higher at 17,856, compared to 1,344 in Menahga.
- Residents in Menahga have a higher median age of 44.2 years compared to 36.8 years in Graham.
- Menahga has a higher median income of $54,167 compared to $51,482 in Graham.
- In Graham, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 29.0% in Menahga.
- The poverty level is higher in Graham at 10%, compared to 9% in Menahga.
- Graham has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Menahga.
Demographics
Demographics Menahga vs Graham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Menahga | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 23 |
| White | 95 | 51 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Menahga vs Graham
- In Graham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 0% in Menahga.
- Menahga has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 51% in Graham.
- The Asian population is larger in Menahga at 2% compared to 1% in Graham.
- Graham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 0% in Menahga.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Graham at 8%, compared to 3% in Menahga.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Menahga and Graham at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Menahga | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 20.7% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 40.4% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Menahga vs Graham
- In Graham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.3% in Menahga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Graham at 25.2% versus 24.2% in Menahga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Menahga at 20.7% compared to 20.5% in Graham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Menahga at 19.3% compared to 15.9% in Graham.
- Obesity rates are higher in Menahga at 40.4% compared to 38.9% in Graham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Menahga at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Graham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Menahga | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 1.3% (227) |
| High School Diploma | 18.5% (249) | 16.7% (2,976) |
| Less than High School | 11.0% (148) | 16.2% (2,884) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (214) | 14.6% (2,610) |
Education Levels Comparison: Menahga vs Graham
- In Graham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Menahga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Menahga hold a high school diploma at 18.5% compared to 16.7% in Graham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Graham at 16.2%, compared to 11.0% in Menahga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Menahga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 14.6% in Graham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.