Demographics details for Melvin, IL vs Conneaut, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Melvin, IL vs Conneaut, OH.
Data | Melvin | Conneaut |
---|---|---|
Population | 411 | 12,400 |
Median Age | 30.6 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $50,000 | $55,708 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Melvin vs Conneaut
- The population in Conneaut is higher at 12,400, compared to 411 in Melvin.
- The median age in Conneaut is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 30.6 years in Melvin.
- Conneaut has a higher median income of $55,708, compared to $50,000 in Melvin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Melvin at 42.0% compared to 31.0% in Conneaut.
- The poverty level is identical in both Melvin and Conneaut at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Melvin is higher at 5.6%, compared to 5.0% in Conneaut.
Demographics
Demographics Melvin vs Conneaut provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Melvin | Conneaut |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 7 |
White | 99 | 86 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Melvin vs Conneaut
- In Conneaut, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Melvin.
- Melvin has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 86% in Conneaut.
- In Conneaut, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Melvin.
- Conneaut has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Melvin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Conneaut at 4%, compared to 1% in Melvin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Melvin and Conneaut at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Melvin | Conneaut |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 14.1% |
Depression | 22.3% | 25.4% |
Smoking | 17.4% | 27.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 36.4% | 45.5% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Melvin vs Conneaut
- In Conneaut, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.3% in Melvin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Conneaut at 25.4% versus 22.3% in Melvin.
- Conneaut has a higher smoking rate at 27.0% compared to 17.4% in Melvin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Conneaut at 18.4% compared to 17.9% in Melvin.
- Conneaut has higher obesity rates at 45.5% compared to 36.4% in Melvin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Conneaut at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Melvin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Melvin | Conneaut |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (11) | 0.4% (50) |
High School Diploma | 22.9% (94) | 26.8% (3,319) |
Less than High School | 14.1% (58) | 17.4% (2,157) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.2% (46) | 11.4% (1,411) |
Education Levels Comparison: Melvin vs Conneaut
- A higher percentage of residents in Melvin have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.4% in Conneaut.
- In Conneaut, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.8% compared to 22.9% in Melvin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Conneaut at 17.4%, compared to 14.1% in Melvin.
- In Conneaut, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.4% compared to 11.2% in Melvin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.