Demographics details for Medina, TX vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Medina, TX vs Spanish fork, UT.
| Data | Medina | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,436 | 44,102 |
| Median Age | 24.4 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $24,566 | $93,989 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Medina vs Spanish fork
- The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 4,436 in Medina.
- The median age in Spanish fork is higher at 27.4 years, compared to 24.4 years in Medina.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $24,566 in Medina.
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 24.0% in Medina.
- Medina has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- The unemployment rate in Medina is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.
Demographics
Demographics Medina vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Medina | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | -35 | 80 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 99 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 36 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Medina vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Medina.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spanish fork at 80% compared to -35% in Medina.
- Both Medina and Spanish fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Medina at 99% compared to 12% in Spanish fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Medina at 36% compared to 7% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Medina and Spanish fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Medina | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 18.5% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 7.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 8.3% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Medina vs Spanish fork
- More residents in Medina report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 22.2% in Medina.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Medina at 21.1% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Medina at 14.1% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Medina at 45.0% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Medina at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Medina | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (126) | 0.4% (175) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (548) | 9.1% (4,010) |
| Less than High School | 46.4% (2,060) | 5.9% (2,583) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.4% (150) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Medina vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Medina have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Medina hold a high school diploma at 12.4% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- More residents in Medina have less than a high school education at 46.4% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 3.4% in Medina.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.