Demographics details for Medford, MA vs Pascagoula, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Medford, MA vs Pascagoula, MS.
| Data | Medford | Pascagoula |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 65,399 | 21,650 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $114,863 | $41,679 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Medford vs Pascagoula
- In Medford, the population is higher at 65,399, compared to 21,650 in Pascagoula.
- Residents in Medford have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 34.8 years in Pascagoula.
- Medford has a higher median income of $114,863 compared to $41,679 in Pascagoula.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Medford at 34.0% compared to 28.0% in Pascagoula.
- The poverty level is higher in Pascagoula at 16%, compared to 7% in Medford.
- Pascagoula has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.6% in Medford.
Demographics
Demographics Medford vs Pascagoula provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Medford | Pascagoula |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 37 |
| White | 67 | 45 |
| Asian | 11 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Medford vs Pascagoula
- In Pascagoula, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 37% compared to 7% in Medford.
- Medford has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 45% in Pascagoula.
- The Asian population is larger in Medford at 11% compared to 1% in Pascagoula.
- Pascagoula has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 8% in Medford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Medford at 7% compared to 4% in Pascagoula.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Medford and Pascagoula at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Medford | Pascagoula |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 10.6% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 25.1% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Medford vs Pascagoula
- In Pascagoula, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 14.3% in Medford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pascagoula at 22.5% versus 21.1% in Medford.
- Pascagoula has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 10.6% in Medford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Medford at 18.7% compared to 14.2% in Pascagoula.
- Pascagoula has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 25.1% in Medford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pascagoula at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Medford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Medford | Pascagoula |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (406) | 1.1% (237) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (8,155) | 15.1% (3,262) |
| Less than High School | 7.9% (5,192) | 12.2% (2,644) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (25,424) | 11.6% (2,521) |
Education Levels Comparison: Medford vs Pascagoula
- In Pascagoula, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Medford.
- In Pascagoula, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 12.5% in Medford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pascagoula at 12.2%, compared to 7.9% in Medford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Medford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 11.6% in Pascagoula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.