Demographics details for Medford, MA vs Fort scott, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Medford, MA vs Fort scott, KS.
| Data | Medford | Fort scott |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 65,399 | 7,615 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $114,863 | $45,206 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Medford vs Fort scott
- In Medford, the population is higher at 65,399, compared to 7,615 in Fort scott.
- The median age in Fort scott is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 35.4 years in Medford.
- Medford has a higher median income of $114,863 compared to $45,206 in Fort scott.
- In Fort scott, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Medford.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort scott at 14%, compared to 7% in Medford.
- Fort scott has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.6% in Medford.
Demographics
Demographics Medford vs Fort scott provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Medford | Fort scott |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 4 |
| White | 67 | 87 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Medford vs Fort scott
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Medford at 7% compared to 4% in Fort scott.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort scott at 87% compared to 67% in Medford.
- The Asian population is larger in Medford at 11% compared to 0% in Fort scott.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Medford at 8% compared to 3% in Fort scott.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Medford at 7% compared to 6% in Fort scott.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Medford and Fort scott at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Medford | Fort scott |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 10.6% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 25.1% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Medford vs Fort scott
- In Fort scott, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.3% in Medford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort scott at 23.2% versus 21.1% in Medford.
- Fort scott has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 10.6% in Medford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Medford at 18.7% compared to 16.6% in Fort scott.
- Fort scott has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 25.1% in Medford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort scott at 21.0% compared to 7.0% in Medford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Medford | Fort scott |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (406) | 0.4% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (8,155) | 13.7% (1,041) |
| Less than High School | 7.9% (5,192) | 16.9% (1,285) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (25,424) | 13.5% (1,029) |
Education Levels Comparison: Medford vs Fort scott
- A higher percentage of residents in Medford have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Fort scott.
- In Fort scott, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 12.5% in Medford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort scott at 16.9%, compared to 7.9% in Medford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Medford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 13.5% in Fort scott.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.