Demographics details for Medford, MA vs Camden, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Medford, MA vs Camden, AR.
| Data | Medford | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 65,399 | 10,298 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $114,863 | $48,302 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Medford vs Camden
- In Medford, the population is higher at 65,399, compared to 10,298 in Camden.
- The median age in Camden is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 35.4 years in Medford.
- Medford has a higher median income of $114,863 compared to $48,302 in Camden.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Medford at 34.0% compared to 29.0% in Camden.
- The poverty level is higher in Camden at 19%, compared to 7% in Medford.
- The unemployment rate in Medford is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Camden.
Demographics
Demographics Medford vs Camden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Medford | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 52 |
| White | 67 | 44 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Medford vs Camden
- In Camden, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 7% in Medford.
- Medford has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 44% in Camden.
- The Asian population is larger in Medford at 11% compared to 0% in Camden.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Medford at 8% compared to 2% in Camden.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Medford at 7% compared to 2% in Camden.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Medford and Camden at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Medford | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 21.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 17.0% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 10.6% | 27.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 11.9% |
| Obesity | 25.1% | 43.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Medford vs Camden
- In Camden, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 14.3% in Medford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Camden at 24.4% versus 21.1% in Medford.
- Camden has a higher smoking rate at 27.3% compared to 10.6% in Medford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Medford at 18.7% compared to 11.9% in Camden.
- Camden has higher obesity rates at 43.6% compared to 25.1% in Medford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Camden at 27.0% compared to 7.0% in Medford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Medford | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (406) | 0.3% (28) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (8,155) | 20.5% (2,109) |
| Less than High School | 7.9% (5,192) | 14.1% (1,455) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (25,424) | 11.2% (1,152) |
Education Levels Comparison: Medford vs Camden
- A higher percentage of residents in Medford have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Camden.
- In Camden, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.5% compared to 12.5% in Medford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Camden at 14.1%, compared to 7.9% in Medford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Medford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 11.2% in Camden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.